Science is not the unique way of understanding and knowing. However, science is a method of comprehending that differs from other methods in its dependence on testable explanations and empirical evidence.
As the evolution accounts for episodes that are also core concerns of religion, it has been an idea with contention within the society. In spite of the differences, the acceptance of the evolution evidence is compatible with faith. In contemporary world, several religious denominations contend that biological evolutions have given forth the living things’ diversity over millions of years of the history of the Earth. In a positive rejoinder, many have released statements noting that the tenets of their faiths and the science of evolution are compatible . Theologians and scientists have eloquently written about their wonder and awe at the life on this planet and history of the Universe, explaining that they note no disagreement between them and the evidence for evolution and their faith in God. Religious congregations that deny the principles of evolution are mostly those believing in the literal and inerrant interpretations of religious texts. This research paper aims to illustrate the coexistence facts between science and religion.
Analyzing the Relationship between Religion and Science
In order to paraphrase the relationship between religion and science, there is need for definition and characterization of each domain. There are considerations that religion gives a unique kind of higher spiritual truth. In essence, there are two truths in the interaction between science and divinity. On one side, there is scientific fact that divinity employs the scientific inquiry methods, tests claims scientifically, experimentally, and rationally. On the other hand, a religious truth transcends the empirical logic and fact categories. However, the two sides conclude that there is no conflict between science and faith.
Unity in provision of Hope to Humanity
There are judgments of practice logics, effective decision-making rules, and ethical knowledge, which can be developed autonomously of a religious framework. Science has a function to play here, as it can widen the means at human disposal or technology, and it can re-model the value judgments in the wake of the case facts and their consequences . In modern world, many people wrongly believe that one cannot be ethical without faith foundations. In reality, since the renaissance, the morality secularization has progressed with independence from religious commandments. In this case, the appropriate fact for the religious realm is that the domain of faith is evocative, emotive, and expressive. It presents aesthetic inspiration, moral poetry, and ceremonial rituals that dramatize and act out the human interests and conditions, and aspire to slake the thirst for purpose and meaning. Religions, especially the religions of the revelation deal in myths, stories, parables, narratives, metaphors, illustrate beings in the anthropomorphic form. They depict the existential endeavors of individuals yearning to cope with their contextual world and finding meaning in event of death. In this scenario, the language of religion is eschatological. Its primary objective is to express hope. Comparatively, if science conveys morality in form of the right and the good, truth, and politics justice, then religion is the realm of expectation and promise. Its main aim is to overcome the hopelessness and despair in response to the brute, contingent, inexplicable, fragile, adversity, and conflict facts of the human condition . Under this perspective, religions are neither true nor fundamentally right, good, or just; they are evocative in attempting to transcend fear, condition, remorse, and anxiety, providing a balm for the pessimistic hearts for many people.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH NURSING HOMEWORK HELP TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT